Articles

Our lawyers are thinkers as well as doers—and have published numerous informative and insightful articles on topics related to their respective practices and our clients’ industries. Read what our people have to say about what’s important to you.

Articles

2013 Maryland IDOT Legislation Expands Exemption Amount Applied For Recordation Tax

As a result of recent Maryland legislation, commercial property owners currently considering the financing or refinancing of their real estate may achieve significant recordation tax savings when using so-called “indemnity deeds of trust” (known as “IDOTs”). IDOTs are deeds of trust (or mortgages) which encumber the property of a Borrower’s guarantor, as distinguished from the property owned by the Borrower. Up until last year, IDOTs generally escaped the recordation tax on the basis of Maryland attorney general opinions interpreting how the recordation tax statute applied to IDOTs.  Last year, the General Assembly adopted legislation imposing a recordation tax upon IDOTs securing loans of $1 million or more. This year, Senate Bill 436 significantly amended the IDOT tax legislation, including expanding the exemption amount of $1 million so that tax savings can now be achieved for loan transactions up to $3 million.    
  
In addition to taxing IDOTs, the 2012 legislation created additional recordation tax problem with IDOTs. First, any IDOT, securing $1 million or more, which had been recorded prior to July 1, 2012 (the effective date of the 2012 legislation) was essentially frozen in place because the statute seemingly provided that any amendment to that IDOT could trigger recordation tax upon the full secured amount – even if the amendment did not change the secured amount. Moreover, for non-exempt IDOTs recorded after July 1, 2012 for which recordation tax has been paid, ambiguity in the 2012 statute raised the spectre that any subsequent amendment to that IDOT could cause the recordation tax to be imposed again on the entire secured loan amount.  In other words, the recordation tax could be imposed again and again on each amendment to the same IDOT, whether or not the secured loan amount ever changed.

The new 2013 legislation accomplishes several things which are positive for property owners and developers. In summary:

1. The threshold loan amount for imposing the IDOT recordation tax has been increased from $1 million to $3 million, which significantly expands the pool of loan transactions for which the IDOT tax can be avoided entirely. 

2. The new legislation provides that the IDOT tax will not be applied to debt incurred and secured by IDOTs recorded prior to July 1, 2012. In other words, such IDOTs can be amended of record without incurring recordation tax on the original debt which remains outstanding at the time of the amendment, even though no recordation tax was ever paid on such original debt.  Recordation tax would only apply to the secured debt under the amended IDOT to the extent it exceeds the outstanding principal balance of the loan immediately prior to the amendment. 


3. For those IDOTs recorded after July 1, 2012 and for which recordation tax has already been paid, the new legislation allows such IDOTs to be amended, or even refinanced with a new lender, without incurring recordation tax, except to the extent the amended or refinanced debt exceeds the unpaid principal balance of the original debt for which recordation tax was paid. In other words, recordation tax would only apply to the “new money” funded under the loan modification or refinance transaction. 
   
Senate Bill 436, which was signed into law on May 2 by Governor Martin O’Malley, will take effect July 1, 2013.  Accordingly, property owners currently considering commercial property financing transactions (or refinancings of existing IDOTs) between $1 million and $3 million should consider whether it may be worthwhile to postpone the financing until then.

Matthew L. Kimball is the Chair in the firm‘s Commercial Real Estate Department, and is the co-author of "Property Manager‘s Guide to Commercial Real Estate Law" published by the BOMI Institute. For additional information please contact him at 410-783-6354 or mlkimball@nilesbarton.com.

see all Commercial Real Estate articles »
see all Tax Law articles »

Past Articles

Regulation Best Interest: Higher Standards for Broker-Dealers, Strengthened Protections for Investor

On June 5, 2019, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) approved a new regulation…

read more »
When “Going Green” Isn’t Attractive – MD Court of Special Appeals Determines HOA Architectural Commi

The Maryland Court of Special Appeals provides helpful guidelines to homeowners and HOAs in addressing…

read more »
Regulation Best Interest: Higher Standards for Broker-Dealers, Strengthened Protections for Clients

In June, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted a new regulation, Regulation…

read more »
The Requirements and Impact of the Insurance Data Security Model Law

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners recommended that states pass the Insurance Data…

read more »
SEC Imposes New Requirements for Brokers and Advisers in Adoption of Regulation Best Interest

On June 5, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved the Regulation Best Interest,…

read more »